Saturday, July 15, 2017

Nicola Tesla Promises Communication With Mars | 116 Years Ago

116 Years Ago the US newspaper "THE TIMES" reported on Nicola Tesla, who believed that it would soon be possible to communicate with the inhabitants of the planet Mars.
The newspaper took a clear position for Tesla and attacked his opponents polemical. Here you can read this article:



There are thousands of people living in the word today who do not believe that the planet of Mars is inhabited. There are many others who do, and some of the leaders in science and foremost men in thought and invention are members of this last-named class. Nicola Tesla, the inventor of the wireless telegraphy, is one of these. Astronomers tell us that the planet Mars is several millions of years older than the earth and H. G. Wells, novelist, in one of his fantastic creations, has peopled this planet with a race of strange creatures.

One thing, however, stands to reason, and that is this: If Mars is Inhabited, those inhabitants are far in advance of us as regards sciences, both theoretical and applied. This is what Tesla thinks, and why he is of the opinion has just recently been made known. He is convinced that the Martians are trying to communicate with us.

Tesla's Dream

Julian Hawthorne says: "Apart from love and religion there happened the other day to Mr. Tesla the most momentous experience that has ever visited a human being on this earth.
As he sat beside his instrument on the hillside in Colorado, in the deep silence of that austere inspiring region, where you plant your feet in gold and your head brushes the constellations - as he sat there one evening, alone, his attention, exquisitively alive at that juncture was arrested by a faint sound from the receiver-three fairy taps, one after the other at a fixed interval. "What man who has ever lived on this earth would not envy Tesla that moment! Never before since the globe first swung into form had that sound been heard. Those three soft impulses, reflected from the sensitive disc of the receiver, had not proceeded from any earthly source. The force which propelled them, the measure which regarded them, the significance they were meant to convey, had their origin in no mind native to this planet.

They were sent, those marvelous signals, by a human being living and thinking so far away from us. both in space and in condition, that we can only accept him as a fact, not comprehend him as a phenomenon. Traveling with the speed of light, they must have been dispatched but a few moments before Tesla, in Colorado, received them.

"This was two years ago; it has just been made public. Thereupon all the tame beasts with long ears in the stables of science begin waving those ears vigorously and braying forth indignant scoffs and denials. Yes, so has it ever been, and will be. How eagerly will every so-called son of science, who has the power of absorbing, but not of assimilating or of creating, rush to trample under his hoofs the man of genius, imagination and wisdom who commits the crime of disclosing to them the means of their own uplifting and humanization! 'Fraud' they cry; and fetch out their musty little books of statistics and logarithms to show why it cannot be anything else but a humbug and delusion. Well, let us leave them trampling and braying, and consider for a moment what has occurred."

The Real Question

The real question, however, is how will these interplanetary communications be conducted: what the medium to be employed: with such interplanetary communication as is propose*, electricity will doubtless be revealed as but the fractional aspect of a force possessing a vastly greater scope and power than have any of the phenomena of our experiments yet revealed to us. The energy of man's brain, if properly applied, may suffice to propogate waves of meaning from one end of the universe to the other, and science will unquestionably aid. Nicola Tesla promises us communication with our terrestrial neigbors. How, when and where? remain to be seen.



Would you like to support me?

You can send a tip to my Bitcoin wallet:
1NL5a2Ao37sLusx7yoknGU6HAt31ztCpbF

"BeSaw" Stock, A Real Investment | 100 Years Ago

100 Years ago a Tire and Rubber Company from Ohio advertised in the "Daily Ardmoreite" newspaper to promote their Stocks to potential investors. They where very proud about themselves and promised fortunes for investors.
Today this company is not in business anymore. On one website someone wrote that they failed during the depression. But I was not able to find more informations about that. Here is the article:



The BeSaw Tire and Rubber Company
It IS NOT a new company without organization, without a tire proven a success, without recognition in the rubber industry, and without executives experienced in making and marketing tires.

IT IS managed by men who have been through the experimental states of the business. It is now operating one plant day and night in Ohio. It has an established and ever increasing demand for its products, being over ten thousand tires behind on its orders this month. It has many other advantages, all of which assure a future of large dividends to stockholders. Purchasers of stock in this company will also be stockholders in the plant now operating day and night in Hartville, Ohio.

An investment in the Besaw Tire & Rubber Co. goes right in on a divident earning basis at once while the new Ardmore plant is being constructed and equipped. Some of Ardmore's best and most prominent business men have visited our factory in Ohio, and investigated our standing, its management, and they also made a thorough investigation of what Rubber Tire factories are doing in Ohio. Their investigation resulted in their, together with 150 other Ardmore citizens, becoming heavy stockholders. We refer you to any bank in Ardmore, our stockholders, or The Commercial & Savings Bank, Canton, Ohio.


If you are interested in learning more about this proposition, we will be pleased to furnish you with further information, upon receipt of the attached coupon, and we assure you that by mailing this coupon, you will not be obligated in any way whatsoever. Rubber stocks have made fortunes for investors. Here is your opportunity to get in on the ground floor, and share the dividends with the other Ardmore citizens.


Would you like to support me?

You can send a tip to my Bitcoin wallet:
1NL5a2Ao37sLusx7yoknGU6HAt31ztCpbF

Murder Confesses To A Horrible Crime | 100 Years Ago

100 years ago the US newspaper "The Odgen Standard" wrote an interesting article about a "horrible" murder case that could be solved successfully.
In addition to a detailed report on the work of the police, the newspaper also presented an interview with the murderer who does not seem to regret what he has done. You can read this interview here:


Yes, I killed him


"Yes, I killed him with his own knife when he tried to kill me," confessed Mike Baca to the Ogden police this afternoon when charged with having murdered Ben Rogers of Logan, whose horribly mutilated body was found in the brush at the side of the Weber river yesterday morning. "Why did I kill him? Well, he insulted me and told me that since I was an Mexican I had no business wearing the American flag. The quarrel started after we had been together all day Tuesday. "I met Rogers Tuesday morning. He saw I was a Mexican and talked to me in Spanish. He had been in Arizona and so he spoke the language very well. We were together all day, drinking and going around the town.

Together All Day


"Toward evening I suggested that we look up some girls. Rogers got sore when I suggested this and, as we wandered down towards the river, he taunted me because I wore an American flag. 'You've no business wearing an American flag; you're a Mexican,' he said to me. One word led to another and finally he drew his knife. I grabbed a club and we fought it out near the river's edge. I hit him over the head with my club and tried to grab his knife. In the fight his cheek was slit. Then I grabbed the knife from his hand and cut his throat. He fell to the ground gasping."

The Wounds in his Body


"How about the bullet wounds in his body?" Sergeant 0. H. Mohlman asked Baca. "Those are not bulletwounds," said the Mexican; "those are knife wounds. When Rogers fell to the ground I stuck the knife in his side and in his back, turning the blade around. It may look as though a bullet passed through his body, but those wounds were from the knife." "What did you do with the knife after you had killed Rogers?"
Baca was asked by the police officers. "I threw it in the river," said the man. "Then what did you do?" he was asked. "After I threw the knife away I opened Rogers' clothes bag and took from the bag $23 which was in it, as I myself had no money. Then I waded into the river and swam through the water in order to wash the blood stains from my clothes. I had left my coat on the ground and Rogers fell on it. In the excitement I left it behind me. That's about all there is to it, I guess."


Would you like to support me?

You can send a tip to my Bitcoin wallet:
1NL5a2Ao37sLusx7yoknGU6HAt31ztCpbF

Correct Behavior for Guests, 13 Don'ts | 100 Years Ago

100 Years ago Dorothy Dix was the world's highest paid writer. On July 11, 1917 she gave advice on correct behavior for guests, published in the "Honolulu Star-Bulletin", a newspaper from Hawaii. For summer guests she had figured out 13 important "Don'ts" and explained all of them. These are some helpful tips that can still be helpful today. Here's the full article:



First Don't

Never go anywhere without your having a specific, definite invitation for a certain time, and never invite yourself. If you have met a woman during the winter who casually remarked that she wanted you to come over to her summer place sometime, don't write and remind her of it, and ask if it will be convenient for you to come next week. Such invitations are merely the small change of conversation that no one expects to have to pay over the counter. If anyone wants you to come to visit her she will have no hesitation in letting you know the fact, and to offer yourself as an unsolicited guest is nothing short of highway robbery.

Second Don't


Never surprise anybody by going unexpectedly to see them unless you sre desirous of aquiring enemies. A surprise visit is a boomerang that invariably destroys the Individual who hurls it at her defenseless friends. There are circumstances continually arising In every household that make It afflicting to have the most agreeable person on earth, or the best beloved drop to suddenly and unexpectedly.

Third Don't

Bear in mind that invitations are not transferable, not subject to inflation, When a hostess invites yon she doesn't mean your sister or your grandmother, and the invitation is not a family ticket, though there are people who seem to think so.

Fourth Don't

Remember that every invitation has a strict time limit, and you extend It at your peril. Of course when the time comes for you to leave, your hostess will express a polite regret that you cannot stay longer. Never do It, There Is nothing so easy than to wear out a welcome, and it Is better to have people weep because you are leaving than to have them moan because they cant get rid of you. A postscript to a visit Is like a second plate of Ice cream - It cloys the palate and never has the flavor that the first helping did.

Fifth Don't

Dont upset the household you visit by indulging in personal idiosyncrasies. If you are not willing to confirm to the ways and habits of the family, go to a hotel where you can pay for the trouble you make.

Sixth Don't

Don't be one of the dilatory guests who are never on time for a single meal. In novels breakfast is always a movable feast, and dinner appears as if by magic, always perfectly cooked at any old hour, but in real life it takes time and trouble and forethought to get meals together, and if you can't come down to breakfast until a couple of hours after the ordinary time, and if you keep dinner waiting until the soup is burned and the roast is dried out, and the hostels husband is saying things, you may be very certain that it's a sure sign you will never visit at that house again.

Seventh Don't

Don't be a wet blanket. As a general thing you know before hand pretty well what you are letting yourself In for when you go to a place, and so, If your hostess is a golf fiend, don't go unless you mean to play golf; if she's keen on cards, keep away unless you play a good game of bridge; if she's adicted to picnics, stay at home, unless you have a fondness for eating mushy pies and have bugs crawl over you out in the woods; If she is automobile mad say, "no" if motoring gives you the neuralgia. When you accept an invitation, you are in honor bound to do whatever you are asked to do, and do It joyously and look pleasant. No one has a right to pose as the skeleton at the feast.

Eighth Don't


And for pity's sake, don't draw invidious comparisons. It you are invited to sail on a cat boat dont discourse upon what a perfectly grand yacht the Croesus' have. If a hay ride is arranged, dont beguile the moments by recalling a drive you once took on the box seat of a four In hand. If a beer and sandwich supper is offered yon, don't speak of your preference for terrapin and champagne. Make the people who are trying to entertain and amuse yon feel that you are having the time of your life. That's how you pay your way.

Ninth Don't

Be sure not to give your hostess too much of your society. The conversation of any human being alive is best when put in small packages. Go to your room and take a nap. Read. Take solitary rambles. Do anything that takes you out of sight of those whom you are visiting.

Tenth Dont

Dont sponge. Provide yourself with the things you are liable to need before you leave home. There are no other guests in the world so afflicting as the borrowers. Take along your own stationery and stamps, your own toilet articles and sewing things. There isn't a hostess who hasn't been driven wild by the insatiable demands of girl guests who had forgotten to bring along needles and thread, and scissors and writing paper, and stamps, and curling irons, and who could have kept a relay of servants on the run supplying them with the things they had to borrow. Nobody loves a dead beat.

Eleventh Don't

Dont flirt with your hostess' husband, nor with her sons, nor her brothers. It's a peculiarity of woman that even the most heroic of them can't endure to see the men they love making love to an other woman. Wait until you get a man out of his home and from under the eyes of His female relatives before you get sentimental with him.

Twelfth Don't

Don't make any unnecessary trouble for the servants, and don't withhold the tip from the maid to whose burdens you are adding. Keep your own room tidy. Hang up your clothes. Straighten up your dresser, and be not sparing of small change to faithful Mary who hooks you up, and obliging Eliza who presses out your chiffons. Chief among those who are never asked a second time are those nickel nursing guests who keep the maids on a trot doing chores for them and who think they have sufficiently rewarded such service by handing out a few words of thanks and a dinky pocket handkerchief upon their departure. The servants determine the invitation list oftener than you think, so if you want to be a popular 'guest who is much sought after, be not one of those whose coming makes Hilda and Dinah threaten to give notice.

Thirteenth Don't

Don't visit if you are on a diet. If you cannot eat any thing from caviar to fried turnpike rocks, stay at home. No hospitality, no affection, no personal charm can stand the strain of having to cook up separate messes for a food faddist A guilty conscience and an upset stomach are two things that decency requires we should deal with only in strict privacy, and so unless you can follow the biblical Injunction and eat what is set before you and ask no questions, either remain in your own house or else go to a hotel where you can pay for the trouble you give.

Fourteenth Don't

And this Is the most important, of all. After you have visited in a house, never forget that mum's the word. Never repeat what yon have heard. Never reveal what you saw when the family skeleton cupboard door was left ajar. You have eaten your host's bread and salt and that makes them sacred to you. Even the savages do that and it's a savage virtue we civilized people might imitate oftener. Follow these rules, and it's "good by - come again!"



Would you like to support me?

You can send a tip to my Bitcoin wallet:
1NL5a2Ao37sLusx7yoknGU6HAt31ztCpbF

Friday, July 14, 2017

Sugar, Utah's Second Largest Industry | 100 Years Ago

100 Years ago the newspaper "Goodwin's Weekly" presented its readers with a comprehensive article on the sugar industry in Utah. At that time, the sugar industry was the second largest industry in Utah and therefore had a high economic importance. An interesting insight into a previously important industry. You can read the complete article here:


Since the beet sugar industry was instituted in Utah, the state has led in the average yield of beets per acre, and is unlikely that this honor will ever be wrested from her. The soils and climate here are both peculiarly adapted to this crop, and it can be grown with greater assurance of substantial cash returns than another crop similarly favored by natural growing conditions. Hence the clamor for more refineries. The beet raising industry is growing in this state by leaps and bounds and the factories are hard pressed to meet the constantly increasing demand for additional refining facilities. The market for beet sugar is practically unlimited and the industry is extremely profitable for all concerned. In view of the fact that but 22 per cent of the total amount of sugar consumed in the United States is produced in its own continental territory, it may readily be seen what possibilities are in store for the industry when it assumes full proportions. Among the great beet raising states, Utah is rapidly appraching first rank. She has already passed Michigan and bids is fair to outdistance California in the near future. Then the race will narrow down to a contest between Colorado and the Bee Hive state, with the chances very much in favor of the home producers eventually I winning out.


The estimated output of sugar in Utah for the year 1916 aggregated 232, 800,000 pounds, the product of 941,000 tons of beets. This crop, enormous as it was, was severely shortened by the unusual period of early freezing weather in the fall, which caught the growers with many acres undug. How ever, the census of the 1917 crop shows that Utah will make marked gains in beet production, it being estimated that her yield will exceed that of Michigan by approximately 35,000 tons. As imatters now stand, the beet sugar manufacturing industry in this state is second only to that of the metal mines and their allied industries. From one small factory in 1891, when but 1,000,000 pounds were produced, the industry has grown until in 1915 a grand total of 109,642,300 pounds were produced by eleven factories. Three great sugar manufacturing concerns are now operating in the state the Utah-Idaho Sugar Company with factories at Lehi, Payson, Elsinore, Spanish Fork, West Jordan, Brigham City and Garland; the Amalgamated Sugar Company with factories at Ogden, Logan and Lewiston; and the Layton Sugar Company with its one factory at Layton. There are several other companies that have been recently organized and are now preparing to establish plants in sev eral sections of the state.

The Lehi plant, the first to be established in the state, was the third beet sugar factory to be erected in the United States. This plant has been enlarged three times since it was first operated, and it now has a capacity of 1,400 tons daily with an annual out; put of approximately 30,000,000 pounds of beet sugar. The second factory to be established in Utah was one at Ogden and the factory at Carland came third. Three new plants were put in commission in the fall of 1916, one at Spanish. Fork, ono at West Jordan and another at Brigham City. The first named was moved from Nampa, Idaho, thoroughly remodeled and made up to date in every particular. Its capacity is 1,200 tons of beets per day. It has been an accepted policy of Utah citizens, especially the pioneers, to show a preference for Utah-made goods; and this has been done in many instances, even when the product of home industries were inferior to the imported brands. In the case of Utah beet sugar, however, an unwarranted prejudice has obtalneu In the minds of many housewives. Somehow" or other, they have been lead to believe that beet sugar is not the equal of cane sugar for canning and similar purposes. Unfortunately, this opinion has been spread broadcast, most likely by those who would reap a substantial profit from the sale of cane sugar.

A few years ago this question was agitated in California, and in order to determine the relative merits of the two classes of sugar, exhaustive experiments were conducted under the direction of Prof. G. W. Shaw, a recognized specialist on sugar. Recognizing the far-reaching importance of these experiments, the United States government caused to be published in a special bulletin (Circular No. 33) Prof. Shaw's report covering his investigations. The report in full is attached to this article, in order that it may servo to dispel whatever prejudice the reader may hold with respect to the use of beet sugar: "The relative merits of sugar from beets and that from; cane have been a mooted question ever since beet sugar has become such an important factor in the sugar market. The friends of cane sugar early in the days of the beet sugar industry maintained that beet sugar was repulsive, ill-flavored, ill-looking, and entirely inferior to cane sugar. As soon as it was found that sugar, white and pure from a technical standpoint, could be made in the beet sugar factory directly from beets, and that this sugar would analyze as close to 100 per cent as the product from cane, the friends of the latter advanced other arguments, especially to the effect that beet sugar could not be used for various purposes for which the older cane product had long been employed. Even today the question is often under discussion.

On account of this, and the numerous statements made in public meetings in the columns of newspapers that beet sugar cannot be safely used for purposes of fruit preserving and canning, and the fact that this idea is quite prevalent among housekeepers, cannery men and confectioners, certain experiments were undertaken in the canning of fruit and in the making of jellies, using beet sugar and checking the results against the same kind of fruit prepared in the same manner with cane sugar. "The sources of the sugar from the cane was purchased from the Western Sugar Refinery, San Francisco, California, and was guaranteed to be from cane. The sugar tested 99.7 per cent pure sucrose. The beet sugar was made directly from beets grown at Oxnard, Cal., and was manufactured by the American Beet Sugar Company, the sugar having been donated by that company for the purpose of this test. Analysis showed this sugar to bo 99.8 per cent pure sugar, and thus fully equal to the cane product in sugar value.

"The fruit used in the experiment comprised cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and pears. Each of these was preserved in different strengths of syrup in the ordinary method of canning employed in the cominerc' a canneries, as well as after the method followed in the household practice of canning and jelly making. In the cannery 'the method of procedure was to make up a concentrated solution of sugar by dissolving 350 pounds of sugar in tanks, then reducing portions of the concentrated solution to the desired density, as shown on a spindle. In the case of apricots, both peeled and unpeeled fruit were put up after the ordinary canning methods, in the regular course of work with syrup showing 40 per cent sugar; with greengage plums 10 per cent syrup was used; with pears, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40 and 55 per cent syrup was used; and with peaches 40 per cent syrup. In most instances all these strengths were used in both the case of sugar from cane and sugar from beets, but in the case of one cannery only beet sugar was used. In the making of the syrup some difference was noticed in the action of different grades of sugar.

The beet sugar caused the more froth in the making of syrup, but further investigation led to the conclusion that this was due to the finer granulation of beet sugar. This was proven by the use of cane sugar of about the same granulation in another batch of syrup, in which case the same frothing occurred as with the beet product. This has been noted in other instances, and canneries are wont to count this against beet sugar, but it is only the result of not comparing sugar of the same granulation. This difference in the action due to the difference of granulation was the only apparent difference arising during the making of the syrup. This is not an essential difference between these sugar, however, as the character of the granulation is entirely dependent upon the wish of the manufacturer, the method of boiling in granulation being the same in both cases. The sugar ordinarily used by the canners is known dry, coarse, granulated, a grade not commonly made by the best sugar manufacturers, because there has not yet been I a sufficient demand to warrant its production; but it could be made by them as rapidly as the ordinary granulation.

"The several kinds of fruit were placed in cases in the ordinary manner, and stored in a rathbr unfavorable location for a period of two years, cans of each variety being opened from time to time to observe the change, if any. Of the 2,000 cans which were thus treated, only six cans from the beet sugar lot and seven from the cane sugar lot spoiled during the two years, and this spoil age was evidently due to imperfect sealing of the cans, thus showing the utter lack of foundation for the idea that fruits do not keep well when preserved with beet sugar, and that such sugar does not work well in the cannery. "The utter folly of this idea that beet sugar cannot be used for canning purposes is further empnasized by the fact that practically all the sugar used In Germany and France for the purpose of canning and preserving Is from the beet, and for many years American refined beet sugar was used without complaint in this country, because the mass of the people were not aware that it was derived from the beet. This sugar was brought here as raw sugar from Europe, refined at American refineries, and consumers purchased it under the false idea that it was can sugar. "But as the industry began to grow rapidly in the United States, attention was directed to the source of sugar, and there has arisen this popular error, which may have been some what fostered by interested parties."


Would you like to support me?

You can send a tip to my Bitcoin wallet:
1NL5a2Ao37sLusx7yoknGU6HAt31ztCpbF


Thursday, July 13, 2017

Red Cross Ships Have Been Targets For German U-Boats | 99 Years Ago

In July 11, 1918 the US Newspaper "Western Kansas World" complained detailed about german war ships who attacked and torpedoed red cross ships without warning. The first world war was not over yet and still many people lost their lifes on both sides. Of course, today some parts of this article can be seen as propaganda. But for me its still an interesting view into another time. and if you are interested in history this may be also something for you. Here is the full text:



WARRING on the RED CROSS


Recently we have had another record of German barbarity in the torpedoing of the hospital ship Rewa, made dramatic because the missile of destruction struck her where the red cross of mercy was painted on her side, as If it were a bull's-eye for just such murderous shots. I was speaking to a merchant ship captain about It and asked him why he had given up the command of a certain British hospital ship, a berth which to my landsman's eyes had seemed to be the easiest on the sea today in spite of instances like the Kewa. He didn't look at me as he answered. He looked far out through his cabin port at the tower of the Wool-worth building.

He finally told me that in spite of the danger it was easier on him to take a merchant ship or a transport through the war zone than to have his heart torn asunder by the suffering of humanity he had seen on hospital ships; men gassed and writhing in agony; men wounded or mutilated out of sheer deviltry. Frightfulness waste of manhood because the kaiser wanted to dominated the world that's what he saw on a hos pital ship; and when his ship of mercy, like the Kewa, was torpedoed without warning and he managed to beach her before she sank he simply went to pieces, as have many hospital ship commanders before him.

Every hospital ship sunk means that the allies must replace It with a ship which has been carrying food and munitions. That is Germany's game. Finding her submarine warfare was not succeeding as she had hoped, she lessens the tonnage of her enemies by fouler means still and covers up her dastardly motives by officially saying:

"The German government can no longer suffer that the British government should forward troops and munitions to the main theater of war undercover of the Red Cross, and it therefore declares that from now on no enemy hospital ship will be allowed in the sea zone comprised between a line drawn from Flamborough Head to Terschelling on the one hand and Ushant and Land's End on the other. If In this sea zone after the expiry of the stated time any enemy hospital ship is encountered It will be considered as a vessel of war and it will be attacked without further ceremony."

And knowing full well that no allied hospital ships were carrying either troops, munitions or anything which they shouldn't in their garb of mercy, Germany has lessened tonnage by sinking the hospital ship Britannic (50,000 tons), Asturias (11.400 tons), Gloucester Castle (7.999 tons), Donegal (1,997 tons), Salta (7,284 tons), Lanfranc (6,275 tons), Dover Castle (860 tons), Kewa (7,267 tons), Glenart Castle (9,000 tons), Llandovey Castle (10.000 tons), and others amounting to over 200,000 tons.

Germany has already begun paving the way to lessen American tonnage by sinking our hospital ships whenever we get any. On May 1, 1918, she officially notified the world that "American aviators are crossing to Europe as members of the Red Cross on hospital ships. This misuse of the Red Cross appears from documentary evidence found on American aviators who have been shot down. An American brought down in the region of the army of General von Hutier carried a pass which referred to him as a member of the American ambulance for France.

"Prisoners openly admit that it is the general practice for aviators to enter American ambulance service for their passage to Europe and to cross on hospital ships. After they are landed in France they immediately transfer to the automobile corps and then into the air service. "The captured aviator referred to had, however, transferred directly from the ambulance service into the air service.
Except for the naval hospital ship Solace and hospital yacht Surf attached to our fleet, and two Ward liners being converted into the hospital ships Comfort and Mercy, solely for the use of the navy and at this writing not yet in service, the United States has had no hospital ships at all. Consequently it would be impossible for American aviators to cross on such ships as Germany states they have. The aviators which Germany refers to as having crossed to France for Red Cross work crossed at their own expense on regular passenger ships before we entered the war and were driving neutral ambulances.

When we entered the war, naturally they weren't going to return to the United States to enlist when they could enlist In their country's military forces in France and get at punishing the Hun earlier than the fellows at home. These captured American aviators Germany speaks about apparently had on them certificates of service they had rendered while driving American neutral ambulances. As usual, Germany has distorted the truth. In this instance she simply wishes to give a semblance of excuse for the attempts she is going to make to lessen the number of ships available to transport our boys overseas, because every hospital ship sunk has to be replaced with some ship in military or civil Service.

The first hospital ship the Huns sank was the Portugal, flying the Russian flag. She was anchored off Rizek, a Black sea port, when at about eight o'clock on the morning of March 17, 1916, a periscope was seen approaching. The Portugal had no wounded on board simply her hospital staff, which included many nuns and her full crew. The Russian government had notified the central powers that the Portugal was a hospital ship and had obtained from them a recognition of her status. She was properly marked under the ruling of both the Hague and Geneva conventions.

Of course, nobody thought for one instant that the submarine would attack the Portugal, and there was no panic until, when about 200 feet away, the submarine fired a torpedo which missed its mark. Then the beast circled arom.d the anchored ship of mercy and fired a second torpedo at close range. The second missile struck the Portugal in the engine room. There was a terrific explosion within her and the hu'i broke in two. The loss of life on the Portugal was 21 nuns, who were acting as nurses; 24 others of the Red Cross staff, as well as 21 of the Russian crew and 19 of the French, totaling 85, all of whom were ruthlessly murdered without any reason whatso ever. The next torpedoing of note was that of the new White Starliner Britannic, the largest British ship afloat and one which the Germans wished to remove from competing with their ships. The Britannic was sunk In the Egean sea, and that but 50 lives were lost out of the 1,100 wounded and large crew she had aboard is remarkable, considering she went down in 53 minutes.

A German newspaper, the Kieler Zeitung, was the first to admit publicly that a torpedo and not a mine had caused the disaster, and further stated: "The Britannic was transporting fresh troops for our enemies. If she had not been doing so our submarine would never, of course, have torpedoed November 24, 1916, shortly after the Britannic was sunk, the British admiralty published a complete list of all persons on board. There were no troops. Germany continued her propaganda to dull the mind of the world as to her real Intent In sinking hospital ships by asserting that she had conclusive proof that in several instances enemy hospital ships had often been misused for the transport of troops and munitions. Under the principles of the Geneva convention governing maritime war belligerents have the right to stop and search hospital ships. Germany never utilized this right. Evidently It was easier to sink the ship outright and trust the world to believe the Imperial German word.

The big Asturias, commanded by Captain Laws, known to many Americans who traveled to Bermuda, had her first experience with a U-boat on February 1, 1915. She was the star hospital ship of the fleet, for at that time neither the Britannic nor Aquitania was doing hospital work. Only the prompt action of the second officer In turning the ship as he saw the torpedo saved her and the scores of wounded she had on board. Having made one miss at the Asturias, the Germans kept at It till they finally got her. The British admiralty announced the following: "The British hospital ship Asturias, while steaming with all navigating lights end with all the proper distinguishing Red Cross signs brilliantly illuminated, was torpedoed without warning on the this hospital ship is Included in the list of achievements claimed by U-boats as reported in the Ger man wireless press message yesterday."

The Asturias didn't sink, although 43 died in the tragedy. Including two women, and 89 were Injured. The torpedo rendered her helpless, as her rudder had been carried away. Captain Laws drove the sinking ship for shoal water. As she was off the rocky shore of Cornwall, if he did succeed in beaching her the chances of saving the ship would be slight. All Captain Laws thought of was to get her somewhere where she wouldn't sink and where her wounded had been removed.

As luck would have it, the Asturias took matters Into her own hands and in the darkness missed a reef, rounded a headland and brought up on one of the few sandy beaches to be found along the Cornwall shore line. After three years in command of her, several times a week crossing the Channel and running the risk of mines, as well as seeing the agony of human beings he transported, Captain 'Laws, like many other hospital ship skippers, collapsed. He's made several attempts to go to sea again, but his nerve is gone. The nation responsible for the murder of Nurse Cavell "accepted the Asturias Incident with composure, if not with satisfaction. For the Germans stated blandly "It would, moreover, be remarkable that the English In the case of the Asturias should have abstained from the customary procedure of using hospitai ships for the transport of troops and munitions."

The Asturias was returning from France. That Is a sufficient answer to Germany. Ten days later the Gloucester Castle was tor pedoed without warning in midchannel. All the wounded were successfully removed from the ship and the casualties were five medical officers, nine nursing sisters and 38 Royal Army Medical corps men. On April 11 the Berlin official wireless again cynically published a notification that the Gloucester Castle was torpedoed by a U-boat, thus removing any possible doubt in the matter. Then on April 17 the hospital shins Donegal and Lanfranc were sunk by U-boats. The British admiralty announced "The Donegal carried slightly wounded cases, all British. Of these 29 men, as well as 12 of the crew, are missing and presumed drowned. The Lanfranc, in addition to 234 wounded British officers and men, carried 167 wounded German prisoners, a medical personnel of 52 and a crew of 123. Of these the following are missing and presumed drowned:

Two wounded British officers, Eleven wounded British, other ranks, One R. A. M. C staff, Five crew, Two wounded German officers, Thirteen wounded German, other ranks."One hundred and fifty-two wounded German prisoners were rescued by British patrol boats at the Imminent risk of being themselves torpedoed. And then on the 26th of February they sank the Glenart Castle, bound from France to England. Yes, she carried troops, but they lay in white cots within the Glenart Castle's white sides. Nice chap, Fritz, for he'd agreed to respect hospital ships if they carried a Spanish officer to guarantee their Red Cross mission. The Glenart had her Spaniard and he too was nearly drowned in the catastrophe. One pleasing thing about the tragedy was that it gave an American destroyer, at the risk of being herself torpedoed, a chance to do a rescue work which makes the blood run faster in one's veins.


The sea was vile and the destroyer couldn't launch a boat. Tet as she passed men clinging to wreckage men too weak to catch the life-lines thrown to them American seamen Jumped overboard into icy water, swam to the poor devils and held them up till they could be rescued. Mr. Daniels. I'm glad to say. has fittingly rewarded such gallantry. And shortly after the Glenart Castle the big Uandovey Castle, on mercy bent, was torpedoed. She also carried a Spanish officer. I have a letter from an officer on the hospital ship Araguaya which has been transferred from passenger and food service to the work of mercy to replace lost hospital ships, and he tells me his ship is most particular about living up to the Geneva convention No nurses are carried except those who make the round trip between England and Canada. For 11 Canadian nurses worked their passage home Germany might say they were troops.



Would you like to support me?

You can send a tip to my Bitcoin wallet:
1NL5a2Ao37sLusx7yoknGU6HAt31ztCpbF

Financial Compensations For Work-Accidents | 100 Years Ago

Exactly 100 years ago the newspaper "Evening Public Ledger" from Philadelphia presented detailed informations about new Financial Compensations For Work-Accidents. Of course, their most important advice was to prevent accidents. But they where also giving a list of financial compensations for various injuries.

From today's point of view these amounts seem to be low. But keep in mind that this happened 100 years ago. Here you can read the article.



Prevention is the best compensation


Here is a brief review of the Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act, in so far as it bears on in demnities paid for loss of life and limb. Bear in mind, however, that the best compensation is your own personal safety. BE CAREFUL ALWAYS. And remember, always, that Accident prevention is of greater importance than compensation. Almost every accident teaches a lesson. Almost every accident could have been avoided. Read and study the following carefully. It is of vital importance to every wage earner. We doubt if you would risk a hand, a leg, an eye, or your life for the compensation offered.

The Workmen's Compensation Act, Its Purpose:


The Workmen's Compensation Act became effective in the State of Pennsylvania on January 1, 1916, and has for its purpose a satisfactory adjustment of accident claims between employe and employer. Payments will be made for 54,500 agreements between injured workers and their employers for industrial accidents in Pennsylvania during 1916, aggregating $4,244,875.43. There were 1241 agreements approved for compensation during the year for fatal cases. The average cost for compensation in each fatal case was $2388.60. The average cost for each disability case up to January first was $23.11.

  • Death  - Reasonable expenses of last sickness and burial, maximum $100; in addition, from 15 to 60 of wages, taken at a maximum $20, minimum $10 weekly, not over 300 weeks.
  • Total disability - Fifty per cent of wages, maximum $10, minimum $5 weekly for 500 weeks, maximum amount $4000.
  • Partial disability - Fifty per cent of loss of earning power, maximum $10 weekly for not more than 300 weeks.
  • Loss or permanent disability of a hand - Fifty per cent of wages during 175 weeks.
  • Loss of an arm or leg - Fifty per cent of wages during 215 weeks.
  • Loss of a foot - Fifty per cent of wages during 150 weeks.
  • Loss of an eye - Fifty per cent of wages during 125 weeks.
  • Loss of any two or more of such members, not constituting total disability - Fifty per cent of wages during the aggregate of the periods specified for each. This compensation shall not be more than $10 a week, nor less than $5 a week.

Compensation no allowed for the first 14 days after disability begins, but employer shall furnish reasonable medical aid, not exceeding $25, and where surgical operation is necessary, not exceeding $75.



Would you like to support me?

You can send a tip to my Bitcoin wallet:
1NL5a2Ao37sLusx7yoknGU6HAt31ztCpbF